![]() In 2002, the year after he was awarded the MacArthur prize, his mother, Dorithy, told Smithsonian magazine that as a child her son had haunted thrift shops and the town dump, coming home with “a bunch of junk.” His fascination with other people’s trash carried into his years in New York, where he took his daughter dumpster diving.įrom the April 2018 issue: Trump and the evangelical temptation And one of the most illustrious figures in classics, though protesting his innocence, would find himself at the center of a trans-Atlantic investigation.ĭirk Obbink had rummaged for diamonds in the rough since his boyhood in Lincoln, Nebraska. ![]() The University of Oxford would be thrust into the news in a labyrinthine case of alleged antiquities theft, cover-up, and fraud. The Greens would see their dreams of a first-century gospel dashed. Yet in 2018, when Obbink finally published the fragment, it made certain hearts even sicker. “Hurry up!” One man simply quoted from the Book of Proverbs: “Expectation postponed makes the heart sick.” “It has been 5 years,” readers complained. Wallace’s blog filled with hundreds of comments. There was no book in 2013, no exhibit when the museum opened in 2017. Wallace had not overstated his qualifications.īut years passed with no news of this “first-century Mark,” as the phantom manuscript came to be called. Obbink’s post as a general editor of the collection-the media sometimes called him its “director,” though officially no such title exists-made him one of his field’s most powerful figures. Sought by universities and cultural institutions the world over, Obbink taught at Columbia before leaving, in 1995, for Oxford, home to the world’s largest collection of manuscripts from the ancient world: half a million papyri that a pair of young Oxford scholars had excavated in Egypt a century earlier. 79 was a feat of three-dimensional puzzle solving. His technique for reassembling papyrus scrolls carbonized by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in a. A tall Nebraskan with a mop of sandy hair, Obbink was in his mid-40s in 2001 when the MacArthur Foundation awarded him a half-million-dollar genius grant. The Greens were known to have hired him as a consultant during their antiquities buying spree.įrom the January/February 2016 issue: Can Hobby Lobby buy the Bible? ![]() And the papyrologist who worked out its first-century date had to be the world-renowned classicist Dirk Obbink. Wallace’s ties to the Greens made it easy for observers to connect the dots: The Mark papyrus had to be one of the manuscripts the Greens had bought for their museum. It gave handpicked scholars access to the thousands of artifacts the family had collected for their Museum of the Bible, a soaring $500 million showplace that would open a few years later near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. The program was funded by the Green family, the evangelical billionaires who own the Hobby Lobby craft-store chain. Though he didn’t mention it onstage, Wallace had recently joined something called the Green Scholars Initiative. Many consider him to be the best papyrologist on the planet.” The fragment, Wallace added, would appear in an academic book the next year. Wallace declined to name the expert who’d dated the papyrus to the first century-“I’ve been sworn to secrecy”-but assured the audience that his “reputation is unimpeachable. Its verses, moreover, closely matched those in modern Bibles-evidence of the New Testament’s reliability and a rebuke to liberal scholars who saw the good book not as God-given but as the messy work of generations of human hands, prone to invention and revision, mischief and mistake. The papyrus would be the only known Christian manuscript from the century in which Jesus is said to have lived. They had debated twice before, but this time Wallace had a secret weapon: At the end of his opening statement, he announced that verses of the Gospel of Mark had just been discovered on a piece of papyrus from the first century.Īs news went in the field of biblical studies, this was a bombshell. On the other was Daniel Wallace, a conservative scholar at Dallas Theological Seminary who believes that careful textual analysis can surface the New Testament’s divinely inspired first draft. On one side was Bart Ehrman, a UNC professor and atheist whose best-selling books argue that the oldest copies of Christian scripture are so inconsistent and incomplete-and so few in number-that the original words are beyond recovery. To hear more feature stories, get the Audm iPhone app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |